I SEE Euro MP Paul Nuttall was once again incensed to write in to complain about new proposed anti-smoking legislation.
It is particularly interesting to see him criticise scientific evidence, something that the UKIP party he's a member of has little regard for and often cherry picks published papers to suit its own agenda.
He objects to the statistic that second-hand smoke in the enclosed environment of a car exposes to passengers to 23 times more toxins than a smokey bar.
If we were to suppose that it were merely only ten times more toxic, I struggle to see how he could possibly find objection in policies designed to protect the vulnerable.
It is a fact that second-hand smoke is very harmful to those exposed to it, particularly children.
It is a morally reprehensible view that a smoker's "right" to smoke supersedes the right of others to breath clean air.
Name and address supplied.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel