A STUDY shows that fracking can be less environmentally damaging than installing solar panels or offshore wind turbines.
The production of panels and turbines results in greater depletion of natural resources, toxicity to humans and impact on freshwater and marine organisms, according to the study by the University of Manchester.
This report lends credence to our support for shale gas and against the so-called green energy methods of solar panels and turbines. The study found that heavy metals and other toxic elements used in the life cycle of solar panels and wind turbines give them a “human toxicity” rating at least three times greater than for shale.
Solar panels cause more damage to the ozone layer than shale gas because of the use of tetrafluoroethylene in the production of cells.
And the silver and tellurium used to produce silicon cells for panels and steel used in turbines mean these renewable energy sources score far worse for resource depletion.
I appreciate this study is not saying that shale gas is definitely the way forward and UKIP believes that there must be stringent tests before it goes ahead but fracking offers a massive opportunity for secure energy provision for decades to come.
Deputy leader Paul Nuttall, Northwest UKIP MEP.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel